Cotton Farming Peanut Grower Rice Farming CornSouth Soybean South  
spacer
topgraphic
HOME ARCHIVE ABOUT US CALENDAR LINKS SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE CLASSIFIEDS COTTON GINNERS MARKETPLACE
In This Issue
Can The Perfect Storm Continue In 2011?
Price, Price & Price
SE Leaders Hoping Momentum Continues
Young Miss. Producer Has His Own Style
Better Climate Being Forecast For Trade Issues
Early Rains Helped Agricenter’s ‘10 Crop
Arkansas To Release New Variety
Gillon Excited About Returning To Industry
Cotton's Agenda: U.S. Cotton Capitalizing
Cotton Board: Knowing When To Quit
What Customers Want: Cotton Quality Can’t Be Ignored At Retail Level
Western Producers Need Specialized Varieties
Companies Help In War On Weeds
PCG’s Cottonseed Insurance Now Offered
Deltapine Launches Two New Varieties
California Farmers Working On Water Quality
Publisher's Note: Cotton’s Mission: Exceed Expectations
Editor's Note: Industry's Enthusiasm Hard To Contain This Year
Industry Comments
Web Poll: Reaction To Ag Apps For Cell Phones
Viewpoint: Want Cotton Quality? Go To Texas
Specialists Speaking
Cotton Ginners Marketplace: Know Your Ginning Costs: The Key To Survival
Industry News
Cotton Consultants Corner: Cotton Farming Never Stops
My Turn: Cotton People Won’t Quit
ARCHIVES

Knowing When To Quit

How COTMAN Was Developed

  print email

Dr. Jake Phillips, once a professor of entomology at the University of Arkansas, had great foresight when he submitted a request for research funding to Cotton Incorporated many years ago.

“Dr. Phillips recognized one thing specifically...producers need to know when to quit,” remembers Dr. Tina Teague, who during that period was a graduate assistant.

Not when to quit farming mind you, but when to quit trying to protect their crop from a seemingly unstoppable onslaught of cotton pests, such as tarnished plant bugs and boll weevils. That recognized need led to research that eventually delivered what has become a valuable cotton management tool – COTMAN.

“At the time, producers were trying to protect their crops, in many cases, right up to the day of defoliation,” recalls Teague. Researchers knew that was too long, but they had nothing to definitively tell them “these are the last bolls that will contribute to my economic bottom line.”

Appropriate Name For Project

The Value Of Cotman

Also during that time, the boll weevil created a need to establish early maturity to avoid widespread boll damage from that long-snouted pest. Ironically, the final name given to the research project ended up being called, “The When to Quit Project.”

Once funded, Phillips hired Dr. John Bernhardt, a post-doctoral student from Clemson University, and in the summer of 1980, Bernhardt started tagging cotton flowers (irrigated and non-irrigated cotton) in 100 degree-plus heat to establish the concepts of crop maturity, building on long-established data related to the order and development of cotton plant fruiting.

Bernhardt was having difficulty interpreting the huge amount of data and turned to Dr. Phil Tugwell for assistance. At the time, Dr. Brad Waddle, a cotton breeder in Arkansas, was using a measure for maturity by following the ascent of cotton’s white flower as the plant progressed. As a student, Tugwell worked for Waddle.

Also, Dr. Fred Bourland returned to Arkansas from Mississippi State University where he was using a program he developed called “COTMAP.” The culmination of these researchers’ work came together to form what we today call COTMAN.

Methods To Monitor

Although initial COTMAN research was based on the establishment of nodes-above-white-flower (NAWF) to help determine when to terminate insecticide applications, using NAWF to determine optimal defoliation time soon followed. Eventually, COTMAN was separated into two distinct parts: BOLLMAN (boll management) and  SQUAREMAN (square management).

Today, consultants and producers actually use BOLLMAN more than the  SQUAREMAN program.

“Identifying the flowering date is very important because you can start counting heat units,” says Dr. Pat O’Leary, senior director of agricultural research for Cotton Incorporated.

On To Texas

The management of COTMAN was turned over from the University of Arkansas to Dr. Dan Fromme, assistant professor and Extension agronomist, Texas AgriLife Extension Service. Why?

“Dr. Bourland went on into administration at U of A and there was a growing interest in Texas, and it seemed like a perfect match,” says O’Leary. “We wanted to offer it to Texas because Dr. Fromme had conducted research on COTMAN, and he seemed to be the perfect person to continue the progression and further development of COTMAN.”

From summarizing crop developmental status, detecting stress and assisting with in-season and end of season management decisions, COTMAN can do it all.

For additional information, visit http://cotman.tamu.edu.

The Cotton Board, which administers the Cotton Research and Promotion Program conducted by Cotton Incorporated, contributed information for this article.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
email
Tell a friend:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


ad2

 

end